Due by midnight on Sunday:
Lincoln Douglas Debaters (Sam, Duncan, Marina)- Finish outlines of aff/neg. Drafts not required at this stage but generate ideas about value/criterion, contentions
Policy debaters (everyone else)- Look through the CX file at www.dropbox.com (be sure to check your email to accept the invitation to view our Bellingham Debate shared folder). Specifically, look at the affirmative Cuban embargo file. Pick out 2 of the strongest inherency cards, 2 of the strongest advantages, and 2 solvency cards. Post on the blog the taglines or email Aly the taglines. Come prepared to practice on Tuesday so we can start putting together a case to do practice debates with.
Questions? Email me: alyhorry@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AFF
ReplyDeleteV. Soc. Welfare OR Justice
C. Justice OR Util
RA. Truth-seeking in crime-solving way, not selfish purposes
C1. No need for privilege
C2. Public right to every man's evidence
C3. Aff impacts > neg impacts
NEG
V. N/A
C. N/A
RA. Truth-seeking relative; not specified what type in Res.
C1. A. Privilege not obstructing justice
B. Justice happens anyway
C2. Benefits > cost